These are, by no means, rhetorical questions and there's no agenda here.
But, if you read me regularly you know that I'm deeply concerned that the CGGC of today is not the Church of God in its movement days.
--------------------
1. If Lance, and other current CGGC staffers and the Regional Directors (and their staffers, if applicable) e.g., Phil Scott, Earl Mills, etc., were part of the Church of God in its movement days, in say 1835, when the movement was exploding, when there was no institution, no headquarters buildings, when our best and brightest were riding circuits and preaching in fields, starting gatherings in frontier cabins and living on a subsistence income, what would Lance and Phil, Earl, et.al., be doing as part of the dynamic movement? That is, without an institutional job to do, as influencers in the body, what can you see these people doing as part of a dynamic movement?
(Again, nothing rhetorical here.)
2. If this were 1835 and the movement was exploding, who, among our people today, including people who left us in the last, say, 15 years, would be rising to positions of influence?
--------------------
As always, I'll accept responses on and off of the blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment